Tuesday, June 30, 2009

New Bicycle Projects In Peril


The above graph spells doom for the P&P crowd. Click here for a larger image.

What we are looking at is an index of the house property values in twenty selected cities across the USA. It shows the decline in prices since the peak of the housing boom. Hear that noise? It's the sound of falling tax revenue to a community near you.

There is an estimated three and a half million excess homes on the market today. (Nationally.) It is expected that we can work off one million units of excess capacity a year, which could mean that property values will not improve substantially for three or more years. Ouch!

"So what does this have to do with bicycle advocacy, anyway?" I am glad you asked!

It means that local property taxes are dropping, and will not likely rise for a real long time. This is the source of funding for public street maintenance and projects. This is where the seed money comes from to get "matching funds" from the feds and state governments.

If you can stand the dirty feeling, imagine that you are a county or city politician. (Shudder) Local property tax revenues are falling twenty or more percent, and that revenue stream is expected to fund local K-12 schools, all the fire and police services, and street maintenance.

Imagine as well that as you wrestle with this problem, a lobbyist for some bicycle advocacy group comes to you and he wants you to find room in the budget for a new bike lane project. What are you going to tell him? Your public works manager has just submitted a plan to you that has eliminated street sweeping of existing bike lanes in the city altogether, and this clown wants you to paint even more of them? Hah!

According to news reports, state budget cuts are as of yet shallow. Most state officials are relying on their "rainy day funds" to avoid making painful cuts in operating expenses. This is all well and good, but those resources are nearly exhausted. Some think the revenue shortfalls will only grow in the years to come.


"As of the last week in June, two-thirds of the states have adopted budgets for 2010 and already 12 of these states face new shortfalls totaling $23 billion before the fiscal year has even officially begun. Combining those new shortfalls with the fiscal year 2010 gaps already addressed, the total amount for fiscal year 2010 is at least a $166 billion gap."

A budget gap that big might even doom mass transit projects!



This is the new reality: Worldwide recession and deflation. It may last longer than you are hoping.

So if infrastructure projects are off the table, what can we do to advance the fortunes of bicycling?

There is plenty we can do now that we will no longer be mesmerized by the siren song of infrastructure. As Keri Caffrey keeps reminding us, we have been applying hardware solutions to software problems. In this context, software fixes are less expensive!


"Got no respect!"

We can begin to fix the status of cycling as vehicles on public roads by demanding the enforcement of existing traffic laws. We must insist that that scofflaw cycling be targeted by police.

How can we claim to be advocates of cycling safety if we countenance ninjas, salmon and sidewalk cycling? (Ninjas=riding at night without lights or reflectors and in dark clothing. Salmon=riding against traffic.) These are the most dangerous behaviors in our midst. Stopping them will prevent injuries and deaths. There are, on average, more than two bicycle deaths a day in the United States. This is not helping to dispel the myth that cycling is a dangerous activity.

It is time that prosecutors and judges enforce all the traffic laws. Breaking a traffic law is a crime! We have become tolerant of this pervasive criminal behavior, because we don't see a great harm in failing to obey speed limits, overtaking laws, and abandoning our duty to exercise due care. It is time we insist that law enforcement and the courts perform their duties.

We have natural allies in this endeavor. Insurance companies for example. Politicians struggling with budget gaps. Law firms. Doctor associations. Civic groups. As strict enforcement renews general observance of due care, all of our community will benefit from a more civil public way. Isn't that a worthy goal?

Rather than spend our donations lobbying for bike lanes, we can spend it to educate the general public with media campaigns. In this deflationary cycle, billboard and electronic advertising rates will fall. Highlight traffic laws that seem to be unknown by our fellow citizens. As an example, as I was researching for another blog post, I was surprised to find out that straddling a lane is against the law in Texas. Straddling ought to be easier to enforce than a three foot law, don't you think?

We should appeal to citizen groups, and local guilds and unions, to foster a renewed sense of civility in our public streets. We should learn from past efforts that were successful in modifying public behavior. We need a weeping Indian.

A public education effort would compliment the encouragement of law enforcement efforts by informing our police, prosecutors and judges about these neglected laws as well. Our natural allies here would also include the bicycle industry.

Perhaps we can make the driver's licensing process a little more comprehensive. More emphasis on due care and responsibility. Perhaps licenses should have to be renewed more frequently. The written portion should be more extensive requiring at least a little study.

One of the "software problems" is that operating an automobile on a public road has become such an common everyday event that the immense responsibility it entails has been discounted by so many of our fellow citizens. We can work toward changing this caviler attitude that our society has about driving a motor vehicle in the public way.

In these trying times, we can at least preserve the liberties that cyclists presently enjoy. As we learned in Texas recently, it takes less effort to thwart new legislation than to enact it. We need to be vigilant and jealous of our rights.

What do you think, gentle reader, what can we as a community do to advance our fortunes without using public monies?

Bike Lanes and Training Wheels


Fred Oswald has an excellent new article up on the LAB Reform website about teaching children how to ride a bicycle... and more.

Monday, June 29, 2009

CycleDallas opens video bar.


No, not THAT kind of a video bar, but a Google Video Bar of Cyclist View videos. For easy access, these will be positioned towards the top of the right column.

At the bottom of the page, you'll find a similar video bar disproving the lies.

Air conditioned.



Due to popular demand, I am planning a short run of these hi-tech moisture-wicking t-shirts, perhaps in partnership with Rich Wharton's Cycling Center of Dallas. The minimum run is six shirts, at about $30 each, or a dozen shirts for $20 each, so I'm hoping to find enough interest to order at least four dozen, and maybe get the price down closer to $15.

For my fellow Luddites, the 100% cotton versions are still available from CafePress.

Any interest? Contact me at pmsummer [at] gmail [dot] com.

Saturday, June 27, 2009

In other news.


Texas on pace to break child drowning record with 50 deaths so far this year
12:00 AM CDT on Sunday, June 21, 2009
The Associated Press

HOUSTON – Child drownings in Texas so far this year reached 50 this past week with the deaths of at least seven youngsters, putting the state on pace for a new annual record before summer has officially even started.

Texas set a record last year with 82 child drownings, the highest since the state began keeping track in 2005. The average number each year is 70.

Patrick Crimmins, a spokesman for the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, said the agency is very concerned with the approach of summer – which officially begins today. The agency said many recent victims didn't appear to be adequately supervised, including an 18-month-old in Texas City who drowned Thursday in his family's swimming pool while his mother and several teenagers were inside the home.

Drowning deaths this year have typically occurred outdoors, in swimming pools, bayous and ponds, Austin television station KXAN reported.

Two teenage brothers drowned last week at a pool in Laredo, and an 18-month-old in Waxahachie drowned after being left unattended at a pool. Two 2-year-olds in Texas also drowned in their family's backyard pools this past week.

"Each of these tragedies could have been prevented, simply by not leaving children alone, either in water or near water," said Sasha Rasco, DFPS assistant commissioner for child care licensing.

The Associated Press


Clearly, we need more and better laws.

Drowning is something I take very seriously. I grew up on lakes, big and small; fishing, swimming, skiing, horsing around dangerously. Hearing about drownings was an almost weekly occurrence.

I go by P.M. because my namesakes (two of my parents best friends) drowned on a fishing trip that my dad was supposed to go on. He stayed home because my arrival was immanent. I was named after those two men, but my parents had some difficulty calling their names. Hence the initials came to be used, and stuck.

Life vests are already mandatory for boaters. Shall we make them mandatory for all swimmers everywhere? The Texas Legislature passed a bill mandating helmets for juvenile rodeo riders (signed into law by Gov. Perry), including practicing on private property. Shall the State go there too, for swimmers? Will another attempt be made for a mandatory bicycle helmet law, next?

Seat belts are "no-brainers". They are the single best thing you can do (wearing them) to improve you chances of surviving an automobile crash. Far better than air-bags. Unfortunately, no other "safety measure" has anything close to their effectiveness, ease of use, lack of downside, and low cost.

But at some point, we have to realize that life has risks, and that the prognosis for life is 100% fatal. Yet we want to replicate that seat-belt success across the board of human life. The trick, the challenge, is to decide when the total, real cost of the counter-measure exceeds the cost of the danger. As has been shown, mandatory bicycle helmet laws achieve their success in reducing injuries by reducing bicycle accidents (meaning, a reduction in cycling).

No answers here, just questions.

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Practicing Keri Waves Pays Off

Maybe it's because it's been really hot this week. Maybe it's because I wore spandex to work instead of my usual tank top, but I got honked at twice today. This is a personal daily record. In the first case, Keri Caffrey may have kept me from my first car-bike collision ever. In the second case, sometimes it just isn't worth arguing.

Case #1 Roughly about where the line is if you pass your mouse over the picture, while I was riding along to work, came a big air horn and a big red pickup with an "OU" sticker in the back window going by. I waved (thanks Keri) to let the guy know I knew he was there. The guy then STOPS in the middle of the road ahead of me. I stop behind, asking "what did you say?" The guy wants to know why I gave him an insulting gesture, but I honestly replied "I just waved after you went by." Perplexed, the guy drove forward instead of jamming into reverse and crushing me like a bug. "Accident" avoided due to Keri Caffrey.


View Larger Map

Case #2 Almost home, with the thermometer at 100F, some yahoo decided to honk at me & gesture over toward the "Safe Route to School Path" on Pool Road (a pretty prosaic four lane road). I just gave another Keri wave & didn't even bother changing my usual route to catch up to the dweeb at the upcoming four way stop. At least all the cops were friendly today.

Several other Keri waves along the way were needed to encourage motorists to do things like continue along so I could change lanes after they went by, to take their durn turn at the four way stop sign, or to thank the 18 wheeler guys when they yielded their right of way gracefully for me to change lanes. I think I'm getting that wrist action down pat...

Got some new Lycra-free cycling shorts today.


Probably won't wear them anytime soon, though.

Verstehen Sie?

The 5 Es vs. the Five Easy Pieces



  1. Enforcement vs. Enabling
  2. Encouragement vs. Entitlement
  3. Engineering vs. Enhancements
  4. Education vs. Excuses
  5. Equity vs. Exclusion

Yeah but, what did you learn from it?


Yeah but, what did you learn from it?

Posted using ShareThis

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Pogo schtick.


One of the problems I've been struggling with is the shift away from cycling advocates accepting that obeying traffic laws and right-of-way assignments is the best course of action for cyclists, and a growing group of cyclists who believe traffic laws that apply to motor vehicles are unwarranted for bicycles.

Whether it's riding the wrong way, ignoring stop signs and signals, or painting DIY traffic markings in streets, there is a growing belief that bicycles are not really vehicles as understood by traffic law, but a special sub-category stuck somewhere in between pedestrians and motorcycles. This use to be called the pedacyclist (kind of like a minotaur), and still is in crash reporting data, even though cyclists have been classified as the operators of vehicles for the last three decades.

This desire for recognition as a vehicle when it suits us causes a lot of ill will to be directed towards cyclists, even the innocent. Stories of vehicular cyclists who seldom experience harassment, but who are subjected to harassment when they are riding with non-vehicular cyclists, are common now. The cyclist who stops at a stop sign goes unacknowledged, while the scofflaw cyclists becomes the icon for all cyclists.

I try to ride in such a way that motorists (and other cyclists) will know what I am about to do. I communicate by lane position, hand signals, eye contact, body language, and lane position (again). At a stop sign, I come to a full stop if the intersection is occupied by another vehicle or pedestrian. If there is no one in sight, I'll roll through at a low speed (below 5 mph), after looking in all directions, so I am not guilt free.

So how about you? What do you do at a stop sign?



Austin, Texas, the city that pushes for bicycles to be recognized as semi-vehicles (hybrid-pedestrians?), and the city many cycling advocates in Texas want to model, is experiencing a rising level of anger directed towards cyclists. This stems from the demand to remove on-street parking for the creation of more (crap) bike lanes, for the demand for laws that place cyclists in a special "protected" category as a "vulnerable road user" (along with people in wheelchairs), and a growing demand for stop signs to not apply to bicyclists.

Here is a report on the stop sign problem in Austin, and a follow-up report.

Today's History Lesson.


Choose either or both. Either that, or choose both.

Either

Both

The Morning Flashback.


ChipSeal's "Redundancies in SB 488."

Misdemeanor Follies and SB 488


06-20-09, 01:16 AM
By Rex G, A police officer in the Great State of Texas


There were parts of the bill that had me scratching my head, and feeling a bit uncomfortable about some unintended consequences that could arise from some aspects of it. (I would be one of the badge guys, enforcing it, and a cyclist on my own time, as well as a driver of cars.) I am not surprised to see it vetoed, and am not angry about it.

Just to be clear, I certainly DO believe we need some tweaking of the current traffic laws involving bicycles, OK? I hope the next session can result in a more practical bill being passed.

Meanwhile, I would be all for more TRAINING being mandated for Texas police officers. There are actually some very good laws in the Traffic Code that can be used to make the streets a safer place for cyclists. Too many police officers do not know the bicycle's place on the streets, and make bad decisions when investigating collisions, or encountering violations of a cyclist's R.O.W. while on patrol. Quite a few officers think cyclists do not belong in the street, or think that a cyclist must act as a pedestrian when in the street.

It is already illegal to right-hook a cyclist, for example, because it is already illegal to right-hook a car, pedestrian, or anything/anyone else that already has the right-of-way. It is not codified as a right hook, per se, but is included in failure-to-yield R.O.W. offense titles. "Failure to Yield Right-of-Way, Making a Right Turn" is a ticketable offense, whether or not a collision occurred, and whether the wronged party is a driver, cyclist, or pedestrian. Yet, it is probable that many, if not most, police officers would take no action if they saw car right-hooking a cyclist, if the cyclist managed to dodge the car.

Moreover, bumping something up to a higher misdemeanor does NOT mean enforcement will increase, and it can result in LESS enforcement. An example, not involving cyclists, was when "passing a school bus while loading or unloading children" was bumped up to a Class B misdemeanor some years back. Something for which I would from time to time write tickets, was suddenly going to take several hours to complete each citation. With so many other things competing for my time and attention, what had been a focus of mine, became one of the things I did "once upon a time" and "back in the day".

I only wrote those tickets occasionally. After the law was changed, I did stop some folks for passing school buses while loading/unloading, but I could either make a Class B arrest, or let them go with a warning, so it was a warning they received.

Secondly, I think the law regarding the passing of school buses may have been changed again by now. It may be "ticketable" again, at least for a first offense; if so, a wise move, IMHO. I have not worked overtime during school hours for a number of years now, so I have not had an opportunity to exercise that part of the traffic code, to keep it fresh in my mind. I mostly run calls and deal with serious crime, and rarely work traffic enforcement for its own sake.

Another example is the offense "Exhibition of Acceleration," which was a useful tool against aggressive drivers, when it was not possible to actually pace someone, or otherwise get a measure of their speed. When that charge was bumped to a Class B misdemeanor, it suddenly became something much less practical to enforce, except in the most egregious of cases, such as when going after people who were street-racing.


I asked Rex G for permision to post his words, and he was gracious to do so. In his reply he said this:

You are welcome to use what I have posted; Just keep in mind that I am unsure of the current status of that part of the traffic code. It is true, however, that at the time the offense was elevated to a B, I spent less time looking for motorists passing school buses while the buses were loading/unloading.

And to be perfectly clear, I was not against SB 488, just really wondering, and concerned, about parts of it.

Sincerely, Rex G


Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Cyclists & Motorists ARE Different

You will never see a motorist fiddle with his electronic gizmos while inadvertently standing in the middle of a bunch of red ants. Memo - sometimes the dangerous part of the commute occurs prior to leaving the driveway...

Today's Kodak moment.


"Those exclusionary, elitist, rhetoricians won't play by my rules!"

Kodak ceased production of Kodachrome transparency film this week. Those who valued color fidelity and permanence always insisted upon Kodachrome 64. People to whom fidelity was less important than expediency and perceived ease of use bought Ektachrome (used in the shot above, as you can tell by the washed-out color and lack of detail). People who liked a rosy hue with over-saturated colors used Ilford/GAF transparency film.

Monday, June 22, 2009

The Self-Inflicted Wound



Sometimes, a review of how we got here is helpful.
Cyclist Inferiority
by John Forester

I have used the term "cyclist-inferiority" in several applications, but these application all serve to describe aspects of the false concept that cyclists are inferior to motorists.

The political application is that it serves the motoring organizations, and therefore the highway organizations that they control, and in addition many politicians, to consider cyclists as inferior to motorists. By considering cyclists inferior to motorists, government can deny to cyclists some of the important rights that apply, in legal terms, to drivers of vehicles, but which are commonly supposed to apply to motorists, because cyclists and motorists are the only significant users of the nation's roadways. The rights denied are denied purely for the convenience of motorists. The most important of these are the right to use most of the width of the roadway, and the right to use roadways at all when bike lanes or bike paths have been produced, or those roadways which cannot be reached by driveways. The only reason for these restriction s that stands up to scientific analysis is the belief, on the part of motorists, that cyclists delay motorists.

The social application is the extension of the above political excuse to characterize cyclists. The official view is that 95% of cyclists are unable to learn how to obey the traffic laws. Of course, they conceal this behind propagandistic jargon, terming the ability to obey the traffic laws "expert skill" and those with it the "elite." Since cyclists are very little different from the population at large, that means that, supposedly, 95% of motorists must be incapable of driving properly. However, the meanness of that attitude is demonstrated immediately by the obvious reluctance of the same motoring organizations and motorists to restrict motor-vehicle driving privilege to those who demonstrate an expert, elite, level of skill. No, as long as you drive a car, only considerably below average skill is required to receive a driving license. It is absurd to consider that most adult cyclists are incapable of knowing how to obey the traffic laws when most adult cyclists, in the USA at least, have been certified by the government as having that knowledge and skill. The only excuse for this absurdity has to be the false idea that riding a bicycle makes you temporarily incompetent, an incompetence from which you recover the moment you get behind the steering wheel of a motor vehicle.

The superstitious application of the phrase cyclist-inferiority refers to the feelings induced in people by the propaganda which has been used to promote motorists' interests. These feelings include the ones that cars own the roads, that cars don't look out for me, that I, when on a bicycle, am an intruder onto their range, from which they will eject me by either threats or death. One pervasive and effective form of that propaganda has been the traditional bike-safety propaganda program (it never was safe cycling instruction and cannot be called that), which taught cyclist-inferiority superstition, no matter how dangerous that was for cyclists. Thirty percent of car-bike collisions in the Cross study (mid 1970s) are caused by the cyclist obeying the precepts of bike-safety education.

The psychological application of the phrase cyclist inferiority refers to the cyclist-inferiority phobia, complex, or superstition, depending on severity of the case. This is the sense that:

"I, the cyclist, don't really belong on the road, which is owned by the cars, and that I am unable to follow the traffic laws for drivers of vehicles, or that if I did I would quickly be smashed.

"The roads are very dangerous places where everybody is against me, and where I have no place that I can call my own to which I could retreat as a place of safety. Since the greatest danger is from cars, which operate to my danger, obviously the greatest danger to me is the same-direction traffic that comes from behind. To protect myself from this great danger, I must do all that I can to avoid same-direction motor traffic, to defer to it when it is present, to always give it the right of way, etc., including promoting bike lanes and bike paths to protect myself from this danger."

It suits motorists, which means most people in the USA, and therefore the various governments of the USA, to have cyclists considered inferior to motorists. That provides the excuse for doing things that clear the roads of cyclists for motorists' convenience. And it assists them a whole lot if cyclists cooperate by considering themselves to be inferior to motorists.

For all of these reasons (and there are probably more), it is accurate to apply the name of "cyclist inferiority" to the type of cycling and the associated feelings, superstitions, and political urges that carry out this program of motorist superiority.


John Forester
726 Madrone Avenue
Sunnyvale, California 94086
408-734-9426

Sunday, June 21, 2009

What Will We Do Without Government Money?




Friends, neighbors and bicycle advocates! With tax receipts falling by double digit rates everywhere, cities, counties, state and federal agencies are all going to be on a diet soon. What are we going to do with ourselves when all the public money for bicycle facilities dries up? Seek funding from private sources?

Here is my idea for how to move forward in this fiscal environment. Advocate for things that would benefit cycling that doesn't cost any money!

I know this will be a hard shift in how we perceive our value. We obviously pride ourselves in how much of other people's money we can get spent on "bicycle" projects.

Sadly, this prideful view has corrupted our mission. We no longer seem to measure whether or not these projects are the most prudent use of our time and effort in advancing cycling's interests. In fact, this has often resulted in expensive facilities that are so poorly constructed that the only charitable way to describe them is an "attractive nuisance". These monstrosities serve to get some politician a plaque to hang on their wall, while the cyclists we claim to serve pay for it with their blood and limbs.

Well, things will be different for a while. Probably for a long while, and the expensive bicycle infrastructure projects we favor are not likely to garner much support when competing with other basic municipal projects. (Like trash pick up, local schools, sewer repair, basic street repair, code enforcement, and even cuts in city hall staff.) What can we do to make ourselves relevant when we can no longer spend other peoples money?

We could urge stricter traffic enforcement. This would be a benefit to all of our community by making the public way more civil.

Even better, we could press for stricter enforcement of sidewalk riders, wrong way riding and failure to use lights when riding at night! That is to say, this is what we would do if we were really serious about preventing injuries and death.

It doesn't take government money to demand that cyclists receive equal treatment by police and the courts when they enforce traffic laws. Cyclists need to be viewed as proper vehicles, not some childish toy.

We can form alliances with other interested constituent groups who would benefit from our non-infrastructure/facilities type activities. Pedestrian organizations, the PTA, public worker labor unions (More ticket generated revenue would mean less city job cuts!), MADD, PETA, auto insurance companies and the like. If someday the money spigot is turned on again, these contacts would be helpful allies for our precious infrastructure projects.

We need to advocate for the equal legal status and equal treatment of cyclists in our current traffic laws. We can push for the repeal of unfair, inequitable and incoherent traffic laws. The law should be “vehicle-class-neutral” to the greatest extent possible. Rather than new laws, we can put teeth into current overtaking and reckless driving ordinances by increasing the fine structure.

Cyclist's access to all destinations must be protected. State and local laws that discriminate against cyclists, or restrict their right to travel, or reduce their relative safety, must be repealed. Laws designating where cyclists must ride within a travel lane are inconsistent with Sec. 551.101 and should be repealed.

Develop education and training materials, seminars, and classes to educate cyclists or motorists on safely operating on the public way. Prepare public messages and advertisements. Raise money to execute them.

Encourage a new understanding of the grave responsibility of operating a motor vehicle in public. (People no longer think that breaking traffic laws are actual criminal acts!) Make hitting things with your car a shameful act again. Demand that all vehicles be driven with due care of other peoples property and health.

Encourage a new sense of good citizenship in the public way. Because all these notions, taken together, will enhance the safety of everyone our advocacy could be seen as less confrontational and thus, more inclusive.

Saturday, June 20, 2009

K.I.S.S

Since today's theme is cycling legislation, how about revising the following:

551.103. Operation on Roadway (a) (4) (A) less than 14 feet in width and does not have a designated bicycle lane adjacent to that lane; or

to

551.103. Operation on Roadway (a) (4) (A) less than 14 feet in width; or

I know it'd give PM Summer one less thing to post about, but I imagine he'd smile at the loss of a topic.

Better yet, considering ChipSeal's comment, just repeal the whole durn 551.103. That's even MORE KISS.

Tell me... just how would a "vulnerable user" law have prevented this?


Oklahoma Highway Patrol troopers investigate the scene of a deadly crash that claimed two bicyclists Tuesday afternoon. The cyclists were riding east on the shoulder of Oklahoma 51 near 161st West Avenue when a woman in a sport utility vehicle veered off the busy highway and crashed into them from behind about 4 p.m., Oklahoma Highway Patrol Trooper Brian Warren said. Troopers said that they found an empty container of alcohol in the driver's car after the woman tried to flee the area. MATT BARNARD/Tulsa World


FIRST A REMINDER: The chances of suffering a fatal injury on a bicycle, per hour of exposure, are about the same as for walking on a sidewalk. Don't get scared.

I don't like posting this, I really don't, but it's important for a number of reasons.

More redundant laws that threaten our rights as legal operators of a vehicle won't save lives. That's a false argument. A local bicycle advocate has posted a picture (probably downloaded from Cycle*Dallas, oddly enough, that I used as an example of why on-street bike trails are dangerous) of a car driven by a drunk driver going the wrong way, plowing into a peloton of cyclists as an example of how the "Vulnerable User Law" would have saved lives. Perhaps they could explain just how that magic would have worked in that situation? Magick laws and magick paint won't save lives (the cyclists in Tulsa were on the shoulder of the road in a de facto bike lane).

For that matter, as the following link shows, more segregation won't necessarily save lives either. A Tulsa cycling blog I follow has more info on this tragic double homicide, and a close call.

The solutions are Education (all parties), Enforcement (all parties), Engineering (pretty good right now, but could be better, as what's good for all road users is good for cyclists), Encouragement (as opposed to the Dis-couragement too many "bicycle advocates" employ as part of their fear campaigns), and Equity (which the so-called "vulnerable user" laws threaten).

Beto y los Fairlanes!



I'm celebrating the Veto with Austin's own Beto!

Reason prevails. Texas SB 488 vetoed. Hell freezes over.

From the Office of the Governor website
http://governor.state.tx.us/news/veto/12636/

Gov. Perry Vetoes SB 488
June 19, 2009

TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME:

Pursuant to Article IV, Section 14 of the Texas Constitution, I, Rick Perry, Governor of Texas, do hereby disapprove of and veto Senate Bill No. 488 of the 81st Texas Legislature, Regular Session, due to the following objections:

Senate Bill No. 488 would create a new class of users of roadways, called “vulnerable road users,” which would require specific actions by operators of motor vehicles. These vulnerable road users would include pedestrians; highway construction and maintenance workers; tow truck operators; stranded motorists or passengers; people on horseback; bicyclists; motorcyclists; moped riders; and other similar road users.

Many road users placed into the category of vulnerable road users already have operation regulations and restrictions in statute. For example, a person operating a vehicle being drawn by an animal is subject to the same duties as a motor vehicle, and a pedestrian is required to yield the right of way to a motor vehicle, unless he or she is at an intersection or crosswalk.

While I am in favor of measures that make our roads safer for everyone, this bill contradicts much of the current statute and places the liability and responsibility on the operator of a motor vehicle when encountering one of these vulnerable road users. In addition, an operator of a motor vehicle is already subject to penalties when he or she is at fault for causing a collision or operating recklessly, whether it is against a “vulnerable user” or not.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have signed my name officially and caused the Seal of the State to be affixed hereto at Austin, this the 19th day of June, 2009.

RICK PERRY
Governor of Texas

ATTESTED BY:
COBY SHORTER, III
Deputy Secretary of State

For a detailed view of this bill, visit http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=81R&Bill=SB488.



Woo hoo!

It would be nice to think "cycling advocates" would drop the hysteria (including the lies), take a step back, and look at the foolishness of this attempt (much less the near disastrous outcome of the anti-cycling amendments the House attempted to pass) in the cold light of day, and begin laying the groundwork for some real, constructive legislative changes to enhance cycling and cycling safety (i.e., the removal of the "far right" language that results in the dangerous practice of gutter-riding, and the hidden requirement for mandatory bike lane usage, that are in the Texas Vehicle Code), but based on the misrepresentations the "advocates" have put out, I'd be surprised if they changed their stripes.

But I've been surprised before. For one, I never expected Hell to freeze over (especially not during a Texas summer), and yet that is apparently what has happened, because I actually approve of something Governor Rick Perry has done.

On behalf of all bicyclists who support, understand and believe Section 551-101 of the Texas Transportation Code ("Every person riding a bicycle shall be granted all rights and be subject to all duties applicable to the driver of a vehicle."), I thank you, Governor Perry.

For cyclists concerned about our rights as operators of vehicles (and true safety), I'd suggest you contact the various bicycle advocacy groups telling them of your concern (remember, they tend to wave the bloody red jersey to garner popular and financial support from people who don't know how to ride without placing themselves in danger), and then contact these organizations, asking them to not support any future disingenuous attempts like this one.

Friday, June 19, 2009

Increased Bike Funding Effects

North Texas Vehicular Cyclist has a good view of comparative danger (measured in fatalities) around Texas and Portland. If you look at a more global level, I can't see a lot of leverage gained by spending ever increasing amounts on bicycle facilities. It might be possible to buy safety from facilities spending, but the data says the spenders don't know how to do that.

The horizontal line is a linear mathematical "best fit."

Veto y los Fair Lanes

Governor Perry is prepared to VETO the Safe Passing Bill SB-488. Please call his office IMMEDIATELY and request that he ___________ .

His office number is 1-800-252-9600


I just got this email. I called Governor Goodhair's (RIP, Molly) office immediately, and I urged him to veto this bill.

This is a bill that moves bicycles closer to the "toy vehicle" classification that many "cycling advocates" seem to want. It does nothing to protect cyclists that isn't already in the books. Other states that have adopted this bill have not successfully prosecuted people for violating it, because there is no provable evidence. Even if a cyclist is struck, the defense remains as it is now. "The cyclist swerved into my path."

This bill exempts bicycles from the provision of the bill, allowing cyclists to commit the very offense against pedestrians that cars, trucks, and motorcycles are prohibited from. As such, it removes bicycles from the category of "legal vehicle", and moves them closer to either "pedestrian" or "toy vehicle" status. This is bad law, written from the Cycling Inferiority Complex perspective and promoted by fear-governed cyclists and organizations looking to appeal to fear-governed cyclists. Resist the temptation.

We can, and must, do better... like getting a bill to remove the "far to the right" language responsible for most overtaking collisions.

P.S. I just got a second email, from the Texas Bicycle Coalition this time, waving the "bloody red jersey". In the email it states that "More than 1000 vulnerable road users in Texas die every year. This bill will save lives!"

That is simply untrue. Not only is it a false statement that "more than 1000 vulnerable road users in Texas die every year" (combining every motorcyclist, pedestrian, bicyclist, farm machinery operator and "other" road fatality in Texas involving a second vehicle, including those deaths that would in no way be effected by this bill, the annual total falls almost 50% below the 1,000 claimed), this bill will not "save lives", any more than the current law that states "vehicles must pass at a safe distance" does.

This is not an education bill (education might save lives). This is not an enforcement bill (it's an unenforceable law). There is no money attached to this bill to do either. This is a "feel good" law that threatens the status of bicycles as legal vehicles to the benefit of fear-mongers. At the most, this bill allows a motorist to be charged with its violation, but they can already be charged with "failure to maintain safe distance when passing", so in effect, it does nothing but "wave the bloody red jersey" by playing on cyclist's fears and feelings of inferiority.

Support cyclists' rights, not their fears.

http://governor.state.tx.us/contact/

Safety Quiz!


Think you know how dangerous bicycling is? Find out here.

Thin ice.


The primary reason I adopted "vehicular cycling" methods (even slow ones) is the old "you gotta get along to go along" adage. I discovered as an adult cyclist that if I obeyed the laws and controlled my lanes, motorists treated me with far more respect than if I rode in such a way as to communicate my belief that I really didn't belong on the road.

But as the Cyclist Inferiority Complex, or Fear-Governed Cycling, gained the upper hand, cyclists began demanding, and getting, exceptions to the rules of law. Special space, special rules, special considerations. While in some cases, these "special" features can be of benefit to all road users, in too many cases they come at the expense on somebody else, either a real or perceived expense.

When that happens, when the dominate group begins to feel that instead of "sharing the road", they are being asked to "give it away", tempers can begin to boil. Road rage directed at cyclists is growing in all the cities that are being touted as bike nirvanas: Portland, Seattle, San Francisco, Austin, Manhattan, Madison, and Boulder.

It's thin ice, folks. Dangerously thin.

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

NCTCOG "BPAC"

I went to the first meeting of the new North Texas Bike/Ped Advisory Committee today. Highlights follow chronologically:
  • Bike rack was around the back as promised - there was a locked door nearby, but all the unlocked doors were around the front of the building. One guy came on a bike. Maybe two. I was on vacation and rationalized that I hadn't started up the Land Rover in a week.
  • Special signin sheet for APBP (landscape people that like to do bike facilities & paint).
  • Among attendees were 2 from Euless, 1 from Haltom City, & Max Kalhammer from Dallas. None said much. There were only four people who didn't identify themselves as affiliated with some group/consultant company/government.
  • Webinar started things off - email response to our questions was promised. My question was polite, but relevant.
  • At the intro, mention was made of PM & talked a little about the new committee, which Don Koski of Fort Worth will chair. The next two meetings will be on Aug 19 & Oct 21.
  • Koski gave two short presentations - one on sidewalks (the "P") and one on the FW bike plan (the "B"). I actually found the "P" talk more interesting. For example, FW now considers 5 feet the minimum width for a sidewalk along an arterial/collector road for purposes of ADA compliance. I see "bike paths" narrower than that. In the bike part, the bullet about 295 miles of bike lanes by 2020 flashed out.
  • Renee Jordan of Plano - Besides Plano having been at their plan for the last 25 years, she also noted they'll use sharrows as lane positioning devices.
  • Copies of the pitches/proceedings promised for the NCTCOG website.
  • Met Velociped. He cheered me up by noting Koski basically said they didn't have money to do any of that stuff anyway. Maybe the economy isn't all bad.
  • Met Eric Jackson and gave him a hard time about BikeDFW taking money for advertised Traffic 101 Classes & not holding them. "I just want to take the class" was the real message. I do feel for the guy - it's not fun trying to run a volunteer organization.
  • Told Koski after the meeting his real opportunity was to not let FW mess up the 50% of the city that hasn't had its infrastructure put in yet (like around Alliance Airport), and it would be a tragedy if his son or daughter was up speaking in 30 years about how expensive it was to fix this generation's mistakes.
  • All in all, an interesting meeting, if a little sterile.

Parallel Universe


From Commute Orlando, comes a little-noticed gem from Mighk, buried 8 comments down. It's about collisions and Amish buggies. The Amish get hit and the authorities think the solution is to restrict them (the Amish, not the motorists rear ending them). Mostly, they get hit on straight and level roads, by locals. There didn't seem to be much consideration of finding out why motorists really were running smack dab into the back of something that takes all lane positions at the same time. On a positive note, the authors did finally realize they knew virtually nothing about their subjects so they were a step ahead of many newspaper articles on cycling.

Read this link and judge for yourself. It's an illuminating parable for cyclists...

BTW, passing that buggy would be illegal in Texas (double yellow line) under existing and proposed law!

Time to wake up and do your homework.


John Forester, the man Bicycle Segregationists love to hate, has issued a very interesting Bicycle Policy Statement for wide discussion. The following is from his website, www.johnforester.com.

Fight for Your Right to Cycle Properly!
The right of cyclists to cycle properly and safely is disappearing. If you don't fight to preserve it, it will disappear.


Since 1944, American society has disapproved of lawful, competent cycling. It was then that bicycles were removed from the class of vehicles and became "devices" whose riders became subject to three discriminatory laws prohibiting cyclists from exercising the full rights of drivers of vehicles. These laws prohibited cycling away from the edge of the roadway, from riding outside of bike lanes, or for using the roadway at all if a path usable by bicycles was nearby. The bikeway system was devised by motorists to provide the physical enforcement of these laws that, motorists think, make bicycling safe by keeping "their" roads clear of bicycles. The environmentalists were suckered into this bogus safety argument and now demand bikeways to make bicycle transportation safe and popular. With the government spending more and more money on bikeway programs, lawful and competent cyclists are being more and more limited to operating on bikeways that are unsuitable for lawful and competent cycling. As long as bikeways are tied to the three discriminatory laws, bikeway promotion is carrying out the motorists' intent of discriminating against cyclists for their own convenience.

Most of the rest of this website explains the advantages of lawful, competent cycling and the engineering and safety defects inherent in doing anything else. That is all support for what must be done now, fighting for repeal of the three discriminatory anti-cyclist traffic laws. Vehicular cyclists and bikeway cyclists must join forces to reform the national policy for bicycle transportation so that it serves cyclists rather than serving the convenience of motorists.

The policy statement for this effort is linked here.

Distribute this statement.
Endorse this policy.
Vote for politicians who legislate for good cycling.
Vote against politicians who use bikeways to serve motorist convenience.


The discussion lamp is lit, but please read the policy statement first.

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

The Twilight Zoning


How'd we get here? Here's one thought worth reading.

As I've mentioned before, I've spent the last decade or so working on promoting urban infill and mixed-use, transit-oriented developments in Dallas, as a way to create better bicycle and pedestrian zones. This isn't new, but a return to the way Dallas was developed prior to the post-war suburban expansion, as were most cities. Short trip distances is the constant in any place with high pedestrian/bicycle mode share. The longer the trip, the less attractive walking and cycling become to most people. Cities like Dallas have used urban zoning as a tool to separate residential neighborhoods from commercial and retail areas. That's why casual cycling is so good inside Loop 12, but increasingly difficult the further into the suburbs you travel, in part because the trip distances grow dramatically. The city inside of Loop 12 was largely developed prior to the new zoning approach, so the infrastructure is still largely intact (even if the land use has changed a bit).

I've long been intrigued by Houston's more liberal (some say helter-skelter) urban zoning. Viewed with derision in the 1960s (and still), and modified to be more restrictive in the 1980s-'90s, it has nonetheless created some interesting opportunities for short trips. Too often, however, these short trips in the omnipresent Houston climate have been made by automobile, and a "short" trip by car quickly becomes a long trip.

Houston has a just slightly better bicycle/pedestrian mode share than Dallas. I have usually attributed this to the presence of a number of universities inside the urban center (Rice, UH, and St. Thomas), but I also have to consider whether the historic lack of restrictive zoning has played a part as well.

Allow me to direct your attention elsewhere.

Over here, for example.

Monday, June 15, 2009

Safety in Numbers.



This data is for a city half the size of Dallas (on about 35% of the land), that has a bicycle mode share roughly 5X bigger than Dallas. It's also the home to three downtown/in-town universities/colleges with 45,000 students.

The City of Dallas averages a little more than one cyclist fatality a year (at least one too many), with a mode share of permanent bicycle commuters below 1% (too low). The city in the chart averages about five fatalities a year, with a bicycle mode share of about 5% (comparing apples to apples). In-town areas are much higher, outlying areas much lower.

What does it all mean?

One of the problems with bicycle fatality numbers is their scarcity. Riding a bicycle has roughly the same risk of death as walking, per hour of exposure. Because it's not dangerous, making it seem dangerous requires the use of scare tactics. Now, I have been accused of employing scare tactics because I dare challenge the alleged safety improvements of bike lanes by pointing out the increased risk of of intersections and driveways, and the lack of any statistical evidence that in equal conditions, they afford any protection from the dreaded (rightfully) "bicyclists struck from rear by overtaking motor vehicle" accident type. But where were the cyclists who were struck from the rear when they were hit. In almost all cases, in or outside of a bike lane, they were on the far right side of the roadway. Allow me to quote a post from a different forum:

From a post by League Cycling Instructor Serge Issakov:

Here are 3 examples, all from just one day of this week (Tuesday, June 9):

-----------------------------------------
A cyclist fatality.

http://www.pnj.com/article/20090610/NEWS01/906100340/1006/NEWS01

"Elizabeth Dawn Allmon, 51, was riding west on the shoulder of U.S. 98 at 9:11 a.m. when she was struck from the rear by a car driven by Monica Frances Rothrock, 41, also of Navarre, according to the Florida Highway Patrol."

-----------------------------------------
Two cyclists killed in this one.

http://www.velonews.com/article/93223

According to a Highway Patrol report, Borland was driving the same direction as the cyclists on State Highway 51 in Sand Springs when she "swerved onto the south shoulder for unknown reason, striking the three bicyclists." The report said Borland continued on for another quarter mile before stopping.

-----------------------------------------
"Only" (relatively speaking) serious injuries, and the cyclist is expected to fully recover.

http://kohd.com/page/121875


Deschutes County Sheriff's Deputies say the driver of the pickup truck was reaching for his cell phone and glancing in his rear-view mirror when he drifted over the white line and into the bike lane hitting Yarbrough.


-----------------------------------------
Note that in just one day three bicyclists were killed nationwide, and one seriously injured, by the type of crash that I call, "inadvertent drift over stripe into unnoticed bicyclist in bike lane or shoulder"

That's about 1/2 of one percent of all bicyclists killed in a typical year, happening by this type of crash in just one day.
I've said it a few times before, but I'll say it again. This type of crash, and what cyclists can do to prevent it, needs a whole lot more attention.

Some argue that a daytime superbright blinky might help, but from what I understand about inattentional blindness, which clearly plays a role in some if not all of these cases, it can only be partially remedied by increasing "sensory conspicuousness" (like bright clothes, lights, etc.). The key is to become relevant to these drivers in order for them to notice you, and I know of no way to do that other than to be clearly in their path in front of them long before they get there (for the entire time they are approaching from the moment you become potentially visible to them).

Serge


The Dallas cyclist killed on Chalk Hill Road last week, the cyclist who died in Richardson on Arapaho Road last fall, the CBS golf commentator struck on Park Lane, Larry Schwartz (struck by a school bus in rural Collin County, and in whose memory the Ride of Silence was established) and the two cyclists killed in Grand Prairie last year near Joe Pool lake, all fit this pattern.

By all appearances, these victims were riding as near as possible to the right-hand edge in the classic "traffic fear" position. Many bicycle segregationists have been known to consider this as riding as a "vehicular cyclist." This misstatement of fact either reveals a lack of understanding as to what riding as a vehicle entails, or it is intentionally misleading.

Riding as a "vehicular cyclist" means accepting and exercising your legal right to the whole lane if it is less than 14' wide (and doesn't have a bike lane). It means taking a commanding position directly in the line of sight of motorists, and not riding in what is essentially a visible blind-zone to the far right, where distances and clearances are almost impossible for a motorist to judge. It means not inviting motor vehicles to pass you within inches of your bicycle, but to instruct them to pull out to pass.

It doesn't mean blocking traffic (no more than it would if you were driving any other slow moving vehicle in the roadway), but it does mean you have the right, and the responsibility, to operate your human-powered vehicle as a confident vehicle. To do so grants you more real safety and more real mobility than any other type of bicycle accommodation. Best of all, you can learn how to control your own safety on a bicycle in just a few hours. Although the data is sketchy and often unreliable, what we do have indicates that cyclists who truly ride in a vehicular manner experience far fewer crashes and collisions.

It's yours for the taking.

Does the Safe Passing bill apply to toy vehicles?


SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS. (a) Except as otherwise defined herein, a vulnerable road user shall be defined as a pedestrian, runner, physically disabled person, bicyclist, motorcyclist, person using a wheel chair or other mobility assist device, child, equestrian, highway construction and maintenance worker, utility worker or other workers with legitimate business in or near the road or right of way, stranded motorist and passengers, roller skater and driver of unprotected farm equipment.


Why is this of interest? As some know, I have been a proponent of some legal recognition/allowance of in-line skates on local streets (speed limits below 30 mph). This didn't win me many friends on either side of the argument, but that's not unusual. I've spent a fair amount of time investigating the legal standing of in-line skates. They are classified as "roller skates", which are classified as "toy vehicles". In the Texas Vehicle Code, toy vehicles are not allowed on public roads unless they have their own "segregated roadway".

In the list of "vulnerable road users" above, every category has a specific right to use the roadway, either at all times (bicycles and motorcycles), or under specific circumstances (pedestrians and wheelchair operators, when no sidewalk is present). But roller skaters never have a right to the roadway, except in a marked crosswalk, traveling perpendicular to roadway traffic.

So, here are my questions: Is it an offense to pass too closely to someone who's presence in the roadway is a punishable offense? Does the extension of protection to roller skaters infer a new legal right to the roadway for them? Or, is this just another example of clumsy, unprofessional bill writing, waiting to be enacted into another confusingly bad law at the behest of lobbyists?

And why no love for Frozen Frutas Paletas vendors and their push carts? Don't they have a lobbyist in Austin?

Saturday, June 13, 2009

Have you met a Sheila? Have you been one?



Have you met a “Sheila?”

Posted using ShareThis

Which one these is a real bike lane?




The answer?
Neither and both.

The image on the top is precisely the kind of sub-standard 3' bike lane with an 11' travel lane that Austin Texas has installed when there wasn't sufficient road-width to do it right (minus the fog line, but featuring a gutter-pan seam in its place), and they are the kind Dallas will probably install at the insistence of amateur engineers and landscape architect wannabes.

As has been demonstrated here, you will be required by law to ride in it (you might beat the rap with your reasons for not riding in it, but you won't beat the ride to the courthouse). And if you decide to stay out of it, and don't get a ticket, you will get horn honks and yells from passing motorists to "stay in the bike lane".

When a truck buzzes you twelve inches from your left side in that bike lane, you do realize that the "Safe Passing" pacifier law won't apply, don't you? Why? Because it doesn't apply when both vehicles are in separate lanes, only in a shared lane.

The image on the bottom is identical (in thought process) to the illegal sharrows that BFOC is responsible for in the Bishop Arts district as a guerrilla action, because golly, "it's just bikes".

Let's just have some traffic marking fun, OK? Fun for everyone, eight to eighty. In the street. I mean, it's just bikes... what could happen?

Down - and YOU Go Over THERE ----------- Cyclist Humor Needed...


View Larger Map
A little over a week ago, I had my first "accident" on my new commute to Alliance. "Accident" is in quotes because it was actually a fall on a wooden bridge deck on the Keller Bear Creek MUP. The ground was wet, and the deck dumped me over. Luckily, Keller has incorporated the "safety feature" of slick wood to minimize road rash & I wasn't crossing the bridge very fast. Later, I discovered that the wife of one of my engineers at work fell while running on the same bridge and broke a tooth. Forevermore, I'll have to resist the temptation to mention "Arkansas" when I see her. Enough of that - It's point "A" on the map & I was riding west. I imagine Keller will rebuild those bridges after someone scores a big legal settlement off of them. I ride the route between Bear Run and Rufe Snow because it's shorter than the road, is about half way to work, saves me two traffic lights, and it's cool (literally & figuratively), with wildlife bopping through the woods.


Fast forward to yesterday. Damp roads once again. This time I detoured to avoid the wooden bridge deck (I may be dumb, but even a flatworm is trainable). About point "B" on Bear Creek Parkway on the map, close to where I experienced my last close pass, along comes some guy in a mini van, pulls up alongside and helpfully lets me know "there's a trail over there." Well, it's been so long since someone said something like that to me that I almost fell off my bike, then thought of the fall, then fell upon the last resort of the speechless in an "expletive deleted" that I instantly regretted. The best comebacks I've thought of so far seem to be "there's a parking lot over there" and "FM 1709 is a few blocks up for you." Y'all probably can do a lot better.

The guy turned a couple of blocks later, to Roy Ln. I contemplated following to leave an explanatory note on his windshield & then decided it would be a waste of my time. Suggestions for graceful future responses are invited...

FWIW, Bear Creek Parkway is no longer like Google Street View. There's about a four foot wide unimproved shoulder on both sides, a double yellow centerline, and a MUP running through the park itself. I was riding roughly in the middle of the lane at the time, so the minivan was on the LH side of the double yellow when he offered his advice. Shades of ChipSeal & his helpful "cyclist friend."

Friday, June 12, 2009

Readers shoot.

My Bike Commute from 3Speed on Vimeo.



Cycle*Dallas reader 3Speed posted this on the internets:
This is a video of my 13 mile commute to work by bike.

It is a great ride through some of the nicest neighborhoods in Dallas. The ride starts in Preston Hollow goes through University Park, Highland Park, down the Katy Trail, across downtown and ends on the south side of Downtown. You can see the route--complete with wrong-turns (I made a wrong turn out of habit onto Northaven, a street I often ride) here: www.everytrail.com/view_trip.php?trip_id=215836

I had always assumed that riding to work was too far, and that there was not a pleasant, reasonably direct route. PM Summer of the Cycle*Dallas blog suggested this route, and I first rode it on "Bike to Work Day" 2009. It was such a great experience and such a nice ride that I am trying to make a habit of it.

My bike is a three-speed and I averaged about 11 MPH on the trip.

The first couple minutes are time-lapse--the full commute compressed into two minutes. The rest is a "real time" view of each main section of the route.

I shot this video the second time I did this route (mini-tripod attached to the handlebars with packing tape and velcro. Sorry no steadycam!) Camera is a half-broken Sony HC90.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Who ya gonna' call?



Missing bike routes signs in Dallas? Traffic signal detectors don't seem to be detecting you and your bike? Problems on a trail?

Go HERE. The more details the better. Be sure and ask for a response.

You can also call in problems in Dallas by dialing 311, or by calling 214-671-8295.

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Pie a la Mode


US Transportation mode data from the 2001 NHTS. Bicycles make up .09%.

Portland Oregon and Amsterdam, Holland report a huge cycling mode share. "Oh, let's make that happen here!"; Swoon the "bicycle advocates".

Oh yes, let's do. If the "bicycle advocates" had all their infrastructure wishes come true, what do they believe bicycling mode share would be possible nationally? A 100% mode share? 50%? 25%?

How many folks do they think are sitting on the curb right now waiting for magic lane stripes before they are willing to throw their leg over a bicycle?

There is a sizable and growing portion of our population that is physically incapable of cycling, thus preventing any possibility of a 100% mode share.

Oh, on fair weather days Americans might get out of their automobiles, but I think it would be to get on scooters, golf carts or some other motorized conveyance, not a bicycle. What do "bicycle separatists" expect bicycle mode share to be on rainy or snowy days? Hmmm?

Sure, they have their surveys that tell them the top 325 excuses people make as to why they don't ride their bicycles. But they mistake excuses for obstacles that are impeding bicycle use.

Human beings have a genius for rationalization. We can bend our reasoning into the most fantastic shapes to reach the conclusion we want. If someone doesn't want to ride a bicycle, he will invent reasons not to. Everyone has a bicycle in the garage or rusting in the backyard. (My neighbor has seven in his backyard, by actual count. They are weathering away to destruction.) It is not like we have a bicycle shortage in America. Ergo, it must be a shortage of lane stripes? Hah! We have a shortage of interest in riding bicycles!

Very few of us like cycling enough to do it on a consistent basis. And most of those that do ride bicycles are fair weather only cyclists. (Nothing wrong with that. It takes a special kind of passion to ride in inclement weather. It is a rare kind. Especially when there are so many other transportation options available.) I would contend that we are unlikely to ever double bicycling mode share from present levels we have now no matter what we do.

Outside of urban and dense suburban areas, even a 1% mode share may well be a pipe dream.

How big is the realistically possible slice of the mode share pie on a national, year round basis? I doubt it is much bigger than the slice we have now, excuses notwithstanding.

An Art History lesson.


Pieter Cornelis "Piet" Mondrian; (March 7, 1872–February 1, 1944), was a Dutch painter. After a strictly Protestant upbringing, in 1892, Mondrian entered the Academy for Fine Art in Amsterdam, already qualified as a teacher. He was an important contributor to the De Stijl art movement and group, which was founded by Theo van Doesburg. He evolved a non-representational form which he termed Neo-Plasticism. This consisted of a grid of vertical and horizontal black lines and the use of the three primary colors.




Paul Jackson Pollock (January 28, 1912 – August 11, 1956) was an influential American painter and a major figure in the abstract expressionist movement in New York. In October 1945, he married the artist Lee Krasner. During his lifetime, Pollock enjoyed considerable fame and notoriety. He was regarded as a mostly reclusive artist, but had a volatile personality and struggled with alcoholism all of his life. He died at the age of 44 in an alcohol-related, single-car crash. In December 1956, he was given a memorial retrospective exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York City.

Tuesday, June 09, 2009

The End of the American Love Affair with Automobiles?


"Pointy-headed busybodies of the environmentalist, new urbanist, utopian communitarian ilk blamed the victim. They claimed the car had forced us to live in widely scattered settlements in the great wasteland of big-box stores and the Olive Garden. If we would all just get on our Schwinns or hop a trolley, they said, America could become an archipelago of cozy gulags on the Portland, Ore., model with everyone nestled together in the most sustainably carbon-neutral, diverse and ecologically unimpactful way."

-- P.J. O'Rourke, "The End of the Affair" in last Saturday's Wall Street Journal

Monday, June 08, 2009

Statistics Redux

PM started this. I love data!

Y'all tell me why, when you normalize things, adult cyclists have fared worse than other transport modes. Myself, I don't think bike lanes or MUPs will fix this trend. Risking flamethrowers one more time, I don't see how helmets are helping adult cyclists compared to, say, anybody else.

Particularly sad, I find it distressing that childhood cycling is largely being marginalized as a part of our culture. As PM often says, the discussion lamp is lit...

More good local (but not to us) activism

LCC will be organising 5 ‘Bike tubes' bicycle rides into central London, to support Londoners commuting into work on the first morning of the tube strike Wednesday 10th June.

We are calling for all LCC members and cyclists to join one of these led rides in central London or even lead their own! The more of a cycling presence we can create the more we can show how easy it is to get on your bike. Here's how you can help.

If you are available to join one of the following Bike tubes, or set up one of your own, please email matthew@lcc.org.uk to see how you can get involved

Meeting points

7:45 am @ Brixton - Oval - Elephant and Castle - Blackfriars - Holborn 7:45am @ Finsbury Park main gate route - Arsenal - Highbury and Islington - Angel - Moorgate - Mansion House - London Bridge - City Hall 7:45am @ Mile End Green Bridge route - Stepney Green - Cable Street - Tower Hill - Bank 7:45am @ Ravens Court Park route - Hammersmith - High Street Kensington - Hyde Park Corner - Charing Cross - Trafalgar Square 7:45am @ Swiss Cottage route - Hampstead - Belsize Park - Chalk Farm - Mornington Crescent - Euston - Gower Street - Tavistock Place - Grays Inn Road - Clerkenwell - Farringdon - Moorgate

You can also;

Let your colleagues and friends know by forwarding this email, so that we can create a movement throughout London to bike the strike.

Download the poster at www.biketube.org.uk and put it up on the notice board at work or on your intranet sites

We are providing all the information Londoners need to bike the strike at www.biketube.org.uk. We've got information on bike buddies, routes and bike hire. We've even got maintenance tips for people whose bikes have been sitting in the shed for far too long.

Sunday, June 07, 2009

A better way to park your bike.


Heavy, woven cable. Front wheel removed and woven through frame with cable. A convenient I-beam to lock to. This makes a great combination for pretty high security, and peace of mind knowing your bike will be there when you get back. I'll sometimes take my front wheel with me to make an even less inviting target, and/or seat post with seat.