Friday, July 30, 2010

This is interesting...

Texas Transportation Code

§ 545.302. STOPPING, STANDING, OR PARKING
PROHIBITED IN
CERTAIN PLACES.
(a) An operator may not stop, stand, or park a
vehicle:
(1) on the roadway side of a vehicle stopped
or parked at the edge or curb of a street;
(2) on a sidewalk;
(3) in an intersection;
(4) on a crosswalk;
(5) between a safety zone and the adjacent
curb or within 30 feet of a place on the curb
immediately opposite the ends of a safety zone,
unless the governing body of a municipality
designates a different length by signs or markings;
(6) alongside or opposite a street excavation
or obstruction if stopping, standing, or parking
the vehicle would obstruct traffic;
(7) on a bridge or other elevated structure on
a highway or in a highway tunnel;
(8) on a railroad track; or
(9) where an official sign prohibits stopping.

(b) An operator may not, except momentarily to
pick up or discharge a passenger, stand or park
an occupied or unoccupied vehicle:
(1) in front of a public or private driveway;
(2) within 15 feet of a fire hydrant;
(3) within 20 feet of a crosswalk at an intersection;
(4) within 30 feet on the approach to a flashing
signal, stop sign, yield sign, or traffic-control
signal located at the side of a roadway;
(5) within 20 feet of the driveway entrance to
a fire station and on the side of a street opposite
the entrance to a fire station within 75 feet of
the entrance, if the entrance is properly
marked with a sign; or
(6) where an official sign prohibits standing.

(c) An operator may not, except temporarily to
load orunload merchandise or passengers, park
an occupied or unoccupied vehicle:
(1) within 50 feet of the nearest rail of a
railroad crossing; or
(2) where an official sign prohibits parking.

(d) A person may stop, stand, or park
a bicycle on a sidewalk
if the bicycle
does not impede the normal and
reasonable movement of
pedestrian or
other traffic
on the sidewalk.

That language in (d) sure sounds familiar, now doesn't it?

Thursday, July 29, 2010

Ellis County has set a NEW court date for Reed Bates.

Reed Bates and friend.

Reed Bates' new trial date, on the charge of 'reckless driving' of a bicycle (originally "operating a bicycle on the roadway"), is set for August 17, 2010, at 2 p.m.

It will be held at County Court at Law 2, 109 S. Jackson, Waxahachie, Texas.

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!"

--Senator Barry Goldwater


As a great admirer of President Lyndon Baines Johnson (Voting Rights Act, anyone?), I nonetheless am deeply moved by the quotation above.
It is not necessary for me to agree with every position a person takes to applaud and support them when they are right (true in the cases of both Johnson and Goldwater).

It's very sad that some major (and minor) bicycling organizations, ones that claim to defend cyclists' rights, have not just stood on the sideline in this case, but have in some instances actively worked to undermine support for Mr. Bates.
When a right is only for people we personally like and/or agree with, then it's no longer a right but a privilege, to be dispensed arbitrarily on a case by case basis by those in authority.

Monday, July 26, 2010

Today's Bicycle Inferiority Complex Quotations



"Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant than would take even a little trouble to acquire it."

--Samuel Johnson (1709 - 1784)


"Lies are like children: they're hard work, but it's worth it because the future depends on them."

--Pam Davis, It's A Wonderful Lie, 2008

Saturday, July 24, 2010

For Steve A


DER TÜRKEN ANMARSCH
Heinrich Ignaz Franz Biber, Georg Muffat
John Holloway, violin
Aloysia Assenbaum, organ
Lars Ulrik Mortensen, harpsichord

ECM New Series

Coded message.

;-)

We'll get back to bicycles later.

Why doesn't he ride on the shoulder?


Brent Nimmo (aka "Not Killed Yet") is holding a BMUFL (Bicycles May Use Full Lane) sign on Alum Creek Road, Columbus, Ohio. A cyclist was killed in the early morning over 2 years ago where Gabe is standing. Travel lane is narrow and a lot of trucks. Brent has been warned and threatened with tickets by local law enforcement while riding on the road and controlling the lane. Brent is very, very eager to get BMUFL signs on Alum Creek, he even offered to buy them for the city.

Relevance: BMUFL supports a cyclist's right to the road. To be used in locations where it is important to inform road users that the travel lanes are too narrow for bicyclists and motor vehicles to operate side by side. “R4 type” - Movement Regulation.
Hat Tip to DanC for this tid-bit from Yaybikes and Ohio!


In other news...


While driving to the doctor's office yesterday, I passed three cyclists on Mockingbird Lane, heading east from Abrams Road. They were hipster (sorry to stereo-type) males in their mid-late 20s, fit, riding decent utilitarian mountain/city bikes. One had a fashionable (and functional) Timbuk2 messenger bag. They didn't really appear to be typical recreational riders heading to lake (those cyclists all use bike racks on their Accords and Camrys for the 3-5 mile trip to the lake to ride a 10 mile loop), but appeared to be on a mission of some sort (hipster Mormons? I don't think so). They were riding within a foot of the curb of the 10' outside lane (this section of Mockingbird is six lanes divided, 10+10+10 per side, with allowed on-street parking in off-peak hours, but it was originally designed as two lane plus parking at 11+11+8), and allowing cars to pass them without changing lanes, probably coming within a foot (or less). Scary stuff.

So I did something dumb (sorta).

I looped a block on a side street, and re-passed them. Like rider support in the Tour de France, I rolled down my passenger window and slowed to their speed, letting the lead cyclist come along side. I then told him (probably to his surprise) that he really ought to ride in the middle of the lane, and make the passing cars pull around him. I told him he'd be safer and happier. He smiled, look puzzled, and pulled into the center of the lane. I brought my car back up to speed (40 mph), and watched in my rear view mirror as he maintained the lane position I'd recommended.

I was just a little late to the doctors' building, but I sure felt better. I hope the young man continues to ride that way, and I hope his companions followed his lead.

BMUFL.

Friday, July 23, 2010

Adam's Extract


"There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty."

--John Adams

Be especially wary of being offered the freedom of being relegated to third class status.

Don't be a "traffic cockroach".


Beehive Collective, Microcosm Publishing
"First and foremost, our right to operate a bicycle as a legal vehicle must be defended. From that legal right comes our ability to get the respect we require. As long as we collectively act like traffic cockroaches, we will be regarded as such."
-- from a comment on Facebook



I once heard a traffic engineer refer to bicyclists as "urban deer". That was then. This is now.

.

Integration vs. segregation.



Get an INTRODUCTION to Integrated Traffic Cycling.

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Could easily be a quote about how vehicular cyclists are viewed by most 'bicycle advocates' and the powers that be.


‎"For some it was crazy, for others it was stupid, and others a day of courage and bravery. For me, it was a day to enjoy being on the bike."

--Carlos Sastre, on his ultimately futile attack on Stage 17 of the Tour de France





Hat tip to Rich Wharton for finding this quote.

Monday, July 19, 2010

Objects in mirror are smaller than they appear.


http://www.expeditionexchange.com/mirrors/

It's not what's behind you that threatens, but rather what lies in front. See?

Friday, July 16, 2010

I saw a man die here last month.



I saw a man die at this intersection last month. It wasn't the first death I've witnessed, nor even the first violent death. I know it won't be the last death I see, but I do hope it's the last violent one.

I was stopped at the intersection of Farm to Market Road 1826 and Highway 290, waiting to make a left turn. A Honda minivan made a right turn on red onto 290, heading east. A Toyota pickup truck eastbound on 290, traveling near the posted speed limit of 60 mph, didn't see the Honda pull out, for whatever reason (texting, map reading, fumbling for a cigarette). The driver saw the minivan, and immediately and instinctively whipped the truck onto the shoulder, where he then hit the brakes. The loose gravel on the paved shoulder acted like ball bearings, and the truck, with brakes locked up, sped straight into the traffic signal mast. The mast didn't budge, but was embedded into the truck, straight through the engine compartment all the way to the back of the cab... right where the driver was sitting. To say the driver died instantly under estimates the long time he spent staring at that oncoming pole with no control of his vehicle. No steering, and no brakes.

What does this have to do with cycling? A lot.

I have helped to reconstruct a number of vehicle 'accidents' involving bicycles while aiding police investigators, attorneys and traffic engineers. To prevent collisions and other so-called 'accidents' from reoccurring, you have to understand what happened in the first place, and then understand why it happened, and then try to gauge the likelihood the event might happen again (If you missed the ITV/PBS drama Collision, I highly recommend it). Things aren't always what they seem at first glance.

One of the recurring causes of single-vehicle collisions, like the fatality I witnessed, is a driver suddenly seeing something in the road ahead and taking emergency actions, which are really emergency reactions. What people don't do when they see something ahead of them is run over it (there are always exceptions). They swerve to avoid the obstacle in their path.

Training (and instinct) usually prevent them from serving to the left (into oncoming traffic). Instinct reinforced by training (Defensive Driving has a whole section on this) leads the driver to swerve to the right. They swerve into trees, onto sidewalks, into houses, up on sidewalks, and onto shoulders and bike lanes. That's one of the reason there have been no measured data showing bike lanes are safer than shared lanes. That bike lane, or shoulder, or sidepath that may look safe to you, looks like an escape lane to a motorist in an emergency (or stupor). Traffic engineers regulary refer to sidewalks as "escape zones", and they don't mean for pedestrians.

The League of American Bicyclists recently said (in defense of their policy of segregating cyclists from roadways into bike lanes) "there's no evidence that sharing the road is safer than being in a bike lane", and that's partially true (the reverse is also true, to a point). The LAB (because it has become nothing more than a propaganda machine for the bicycle facilities lobby) constantly spins and intentionally twists data, leaving out key elements, to present a favorable (to their cause of segregating cyclists from public roadways).

In looking over the CDC and NHTSA bicycle crash data, I discovered years ago that the incident of "collision from the rear" was the same for cyclists in bike lanes and on streets without bike lanes. But there's more to the story. Every bicycle crash incident study shows that the danger isn't in the bike lanes themselves, but at intersections due to turning and crossing movements. These intersections aren't counted as "in the bike lane" because they are outside of them (that's changing with the dangerous innovation of colored bike lanes across intersections, and we'll see data soon about that in the future). Bike lane users at intersections have a dramatically higher rate of collision with turning and crossing motor vehicles than do cyclists riding in the roadway (not those riding off of the roadway, such as on the shoulder or on a sidewalk).

By happenstance, this was illustrated this morning.

I took the picture below on my commute to work. It shows a car being removed from a trail that runs parallel to a major thoroughfare. A motorist ran off the road (reason unclear) and plowed into the newly dedicated White Rock Lake Spillway trail section, miraculously missing any runners or cyclists (trail traffic is fairly heavy that time of day). The motorist utilized the escape zone. Luckily, only a small tree sacrified its life in slowing down the Mini. It could have been much worse.



P.S. This new, improved trail section is 30 feet closer to the six lane divided roadway than the old one was (it used to run along the fence line to the left). But it's prettier to look at. "Aesthetics over safety", is what they said at a public meeting.

Stop the madness! We can do so much better.

Stop the madness! We can do so much better.

Thursday, July 15, 2010

But if cyclists "feel" safer, who cares?

From
September 10, 2009

Cycle lanes encourage motorists to drive closer to bikes, says study
Ben Webster, Environment Editor

Cycle lanes can make roads more dangerous for cyclists because they encourage motorists to drive closer when overtaking bicycles, a study has found.

Drivers give cyclists a wider berth on roads where there is no lane because they assume that they should share the road and make more allowance for the risk of wobbles.

The study, conducted by Leeds and Bolton universities, challenges the approach taken by many local authorities, which is to promote cycling by painting cycle lanes and cycle symbols on their roads. It suggests that reducing the speed and volume of traffic would be more effective in improving cycle safety than narrow cycle lanes.

Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, is planning to create 12 “cycle superhighways” by 2012 but his transport authority said yesterday that most of the network would be lanes painted on roads rather than segregated cycle paths.

For the study the researchers mounted a camcorder on the rear rack of a bicycle and rode on three roads that each had sections with and without cycle lanes. On all three roads, drivers gave cyclists less room where there was a cycle lane. The greatest difference was recorded on the A6 near Garstang, Lancashire, where cars passed 18cm (7in) closer when the cyclist was in a cycle lane.

All the cycle lanes were slightly narrower than the minimum width of 1.5m (5ft) recommended by the Department for Transport. The majority of Britain’s cycle lanes do not comply with this guideline.

The study, which is due to be published in the scientific journal Accident Analysis and Prevention, says that on roads without cycle lanes, drivers “consciously perform an overtaking manoeuvre”. On roads with cycle lanes, they treat the space between the centre line and the outside edge of the cycle lane as exclusively their territory and make less adjustment for cyclists.

The study concludes: “Cycle lanes do not appear to provide greater space for cyclists in all conditions.” The Highway Code tells drivers to “give cyclists at least as much room as you would when overtaking a car”.

Chris Peck, policy co-ordinator of the Cyclists’ Touring Club, said: “Cycle lanes have a part to play in improving road conditions for cyclists, but this research has raised concerns that they are not always the best solution and may make cycling more unpleasant.”

He said that too many authorities viewed cycle lanes as a cheap and easy alternative to more effective measures of reducing the vulnerability of cyclists, such as cutting the speed limit to 20mph and redesigning awkward junctions. Mr Peck added that narrow cycle lanes could create tension between drivers and cyclists, with drivers becoming annoyed when cyclists strayed outside them. Some cyclists felt under pressure to remain within the lane until the last moment when turning right, leading to sudden, potentially dangerous manoeuvres.

He said: “Cycle lanes are a good visual reminder to people that cycling is being encouraged but they can cause cyclists to hug the kerb, which may not be the safest place to be.”

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Take your lane, or risk this.

Bexar County investigators look at a mangled bike that was struck by a pickup in far West Bexar County Sunday morning. Eva Ruth Moravec/Express-News

Bicyclist critically injured after being struck on FM 471

By Eva Ruth Moravec - San Antonio Express-News

A bicyclist was critically injured Sunday morning, when he veered into a far West Side road and was struck by a pickup.

Jeffery D. Oliver, 53, was riding east in the 2-foot-wide shoulder of FM 471 near Old FM 471 around 11:15 a.m. when he rode into the road and collided with an eastbound maroon pickup, said Lt. Kyle Coleman with the Bexar County Sheriff's Office.

"As the pickup approached, the bicycle rider turned and looked back for some reason," Coleman said. "He just got too close to the roadway."

Coleman said Oliver, who wore a helmet, was flung into FM 471, where passers-by stopped to help him and called 911. He sustained major head injuries and was unconscious when he was flown to University Hospital, Coleman said. Oliver was in critical condition, Sunday evening.

The driver of the pickup, Abel Tijerina, 52, was not injured and not believed to face any criminal charges in connection with the crash, but Coleman said the investigation continues.

The article says he was riding in a two foot wide shoulder. As you can see, it's a one foot wide shoulder, with a three inch drop-off, and another eight inches of pavement (all measurements approximate). He wasn't riding on a two foot shoulder. The cyclist was trying to ride on a tight rope. He fell.

Had he controlled his lane, he'd be safe today. But he listened to years of incorrect "as far right as possible" cyclist inferiority propaganda, reinforced by so-called 'bicycle advocates' (including San Antonio's bicycle coordinator) calling for bike lanes for cyclists to ride in, perpetuating the 'fear-based' cycling mentality.

Take your lane, and live. Please. Don't try and be a high-wire act.




Now... read the previous post (below) about Reed Bates.

Reed is an experienced cyclist who has no car. His method of transportation is by bicycle.

Reed has spent a fortnight in jail in Ellis County for refusing to ride his bicycle on the shoulder of multi-lane roads with shoulders much like the one shown above. In some places, the shoulders on the roads where he cycled were better than the one Mr. Oliver was struck on. In other places, worse.

The Ennis Police, and the Ellis County Sheriff's Department told him to stay there (contrary to what the law says). Sadly, some national and state 'bicycle advocates' have now decided that's where he should ride as well, and that Mr. bates is being unreasonable in protecting not just his rights, but his physical safety. They have convinced some local cycling advocates, through factual lies and distortions, of the same thing. If they think Reed Bates should ride there, then they think Jeffery Oliver should ride there as well... and so should you, too.

Do you see why this is important? You have a legal right (and, dare I say, a responsibility) to operate your bicycle safely. Exercise it, defend it, and defend yourself from unnecessary tragedy.

An open letter from Reed Bates.


As played earlier at Casita Verano

In honor of Bastille Day, and to set the record straight, I reprint the letter Reed Bates wrote (published here with his permission) to some of his supporters following his release from the Ellis County jail, where (pending trial) he was held for refusing to plead guilty to the charge of riding a bicycle on the roadway (changed to 'reckless driving').

June 29, 2010

Dear friends,

I am sorry for the long delay in updating you all about my legal status and situation. I have allowed myself to be distracted and I have neglected you. I shall aim to avoid allowing it to happen again. Thank you for your forbearance.

As this is a long explanatory letter, if you are pressed for time, skip to the bottom for a summery of events at the end of this letter.

Near the end of April, I moved from Ennis to Dallas, where I was graciously sheltered by P. M. Summer (ed.; and his wife). I found a job there and devoted myself to succeed at it, and in so doing I failed to keep close tabs on the courts.

Notice of that a trial date was set for May 7 and a plea bargain from the County DA were not forwarded to me, and were not sent to our attorney, Mr. Jones. Those are salient facts, and I now turn to filling in the picture.

I should have reported my address change to the courts at or before the time I moved, but I did not do so. I should have called the court clerk to inquire of the status of my cases, but I did not. My friend at my old address should have forwarded my mail, but he didn’t. The court should have sent notice to Mr. Jones, but they had no record of him being my council on this particular charge. In the end, I am solely to blame for missing the May 7 court date.

On June 5, I moved from Mr. Summer’s home to share a home with two other guys.

On May 7, a warrant was issued for my arrest for "failure to appear". (FTA) On June 8, I was arrested in the city of Rockwall whilst applying for a solicitor’s permit, and held on a $5,000 bond in the Rockwall County jail.

Within a few days, when attempts to raise enough money for bail failed, Lee Wiltsey (my boss) hired an attorney (Mrs. Summers) to expedite my transfer to Ellis County.

On June 21, Ellis County transferred me to Ellis County jail in Waxahachie.

On June 23, a hearing was held in a Waxahachie courthouse. The Mrs. Summers was present but not Mr. Jones.

There were three issues at hand: Who did I want to represent me, what was the underlying charge to the warrant I was arrested on, (Was it the appeal of the Ennis City convictions, or the Ellis County arrest of January 16 –the reckless driving charge?) and consideration of reducing the bond I was being held on.

It was very muddled, and the judge put off any decision until Friday the 25th when both Mr. Jones and Mrs. Summers could both be there.

At that time, Ms. Summers showed me a copy of the trial date notice, and I found that the DA had made a plea bargain. If I paid a $200 fine and court costs, the matter would be dropped. Mrs. Summers asked if that was what I wanted to do. I said I was not interested in pleading guilty to a crime I did not commit. She told me that I may have to remain in jail until the trial was held. I told her I was prepared to do that.

Mr. Jones came to the county jail on Thursday and had a long conference with me. He had suffered a bout of ill health, and without knowing his ailment, I had been concerned about his ability to represent me. With those fears laid to rest, I have great confidence in his ability to see these issues brought to a satisfactory conclusion.

On Friday, Mr. Jones appeared with me, and Mrs. Summers was not there, having agreed with my decision the night before to affirm my desire to be represented by Mr. Jones.

The judge questioned Mr. Jones about how long he thought presenting the case would take when we requested a trial before the court rather than a trial by jury. Less than two hours, he replied. Would he be able to defend me on this charge and the appeal if they were both held on the same day? Yes.

The Judge then set aside the morning of July 29, a Thursday, to hear the reckless driving charge (a class B misdemeanor) and then hear a procedural question the DA was requesting on the Ennis City appeal. If that question is decided in our favor, the appeal would be heard immediately. (Impeding traffic is a class C misdemeanor, a lesser charge than the other.)

There are some other details that I am not clear on, but I will inform all of you of them early this week.

The DA also made a new plea deal: Time served plus court costs and three months probation. Again I refused the offer.

Mr. Jones requested a bond reduction because his client was keen on having the matter adjudicated. The DA suggested a $500 bond. Mr. Jones suggest $200 as more reasonable. The judge reduced it to $300.

On Saturday June 26, a person on this mailing list (Who had traveled to Waxahachie to visit me.) put up the cash out of his own pocket to bail me out when he heard what the amount had been reduced to.

I am returning to my job, it has been held for me. My housing situations is not in peril either, so I have much to be thankful for.

Again, apologies to everyone for the long silence.

Reed

Summery of events:

May 7 I missed a court date for a trial on the Ellis county Charge (Reckless Driving)

First week of June, I was arrested on an outstanding warrant for failure to appear.

19 days later I was released on a $300 bond (Last Saturday)

Starting at 9 AM July 29, I will be tried for reckless driving. Afterward, a procedural ruling will be made about the Ennis City appeal, and depending on the outcome of that question, there is a good chance that the court will proceed to hear the appeal that day.


Editor's Note: To avoid any confusion, and the dissemination of misleading stories, Reed's temporary attorney, Mrs. Summers, is not related to, or known by, P.M. Summer.

Monday, July 12, 2010

Silence of the lamps.


"Das Schweigen von Marcel Duchamp wird überbewertet."

--Joseph Beuys

Saturday, July 10, 2010

An OK challenge for cyclists.


It's not like this.
Teaching others how to ride bicycles safely and comfortably regardless of conditions is one of the things I found most enjoyable about the LCI program. It's thrilling to see a student's eyes light up when they suddenly 'get it' and discover that riding in traffic isn't the hair raising experience that seems to be so prevalent in common wisdom. There's an awareness of a new found freedom that doesn't depend on special bicycle-only infrastructure. When students incorporate this knowledge into their own behavior, they realize that their bikes can take them nearly anywhere.

--Ed Wagner


Are you up for a simple, easy challenge? Click in here (clipless pedals not required, just an open mind and a bicycle).

Friday, July 09, 2010

Why do architects dis bicyclists (while claiming to love them)?



My neighborhood's new branch library: Very good.

Bike parking: Good.

Near front entrance: Very good.

Ribbon rack: Not so good.

Exposed to the elements: Bad.


...but it all looks GREAT on the LEED certification checklist.

Friday, July 02, 2010

Welcome to Hamsterdam!



While sitting in the hospital ER waiting room last night, watching and talking to people with real life and death problems and real fears, I saw an ad on teevee for a very poor excuse for a European beer, Amstel Light. It showed lots of scenes of lemming-like folk being touro-lemmings in Amsterdam... and getting an "Amster Dam Fine Beer"™ at a local gastropub.

Consider a movement to be in its death throes when Madison Avenue discovers it's useful in selling crap beer to lemmings. Welcome to Hamsterdam.